diff --git a/conf.py b/conf.py
index 1958cba..0f31664 100644
--- a/conf.py
+++ b/conf.py
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ copyright = '2021 Lee Yingtong Li'
author = 'Lee Yingtong Li'
# The full version, including alpha/beta/rc tags
-release = '0.3.1-dev'
+release = '0.3.1'
version = release
diff --git a/epub-copyright.xhtml b/epub-copyright.xhtml
index dfd1f48..5c3800d 100644
--- a/epub-copyright.xhtml
+++ b/epub-copyright.xhtml
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Edition 0.1 first published 2018
Edition 0.2 first published 2021
- Edition 0.3.1-dev first published 2021
+ Edition 0.3.1 first published 2021
https://yingtongli.me/pointsoforder
Copyright © 2021 Lee Yingtong Li. You may use this book, at your option, under either of the following licences:
- the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence
diff --git a/preamble.tex.txt b/preamble.tex.txt
index 3830767..77516bb 100644
--- a/preamble.tex.txt
+++ b/preamble.tex.txt
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
\begingroup\footnotesize
Edition 0.1 first published 2018 \\
Edition 0.2 first published 2021 \\
- Edition 0.3.1-dev first published 2021
+ Edition 0.3.1 first published 2021
\vspace{1cm}
diff --git a/transacting-business.rst b/transacting-business.rst
index 7d5285d..5ab4298 100644
--- a/transacting-business.rst
+++ b/transacting-business.rst
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ Like motions, there are a number of rules that amendments must comply with:
Some authorities provide that amendments must be moved in the order they affect the motion, i.e. no amendment may be moved to part of a motion preceding a part previously proposed to be amended.\ [#fn79]_ The author feels this approach to be unnecessarily restrictive, but if it is to be followed, it would be prudent, when an amendment is moved, for the Chair to ask if anyone wishes to propose an amendment to an earlier part of the motion, which would then be considered first.
-Additionally, some authorities provide that an amendment may not be itself amended (a *second-degree amendment*), and that alternative amendments should instead be mref:`foreshadowed `.\ [#fn62]_ This has the advantage of avoiding the potentially confusing conceptual complexity of ‘amending an amendment’, but the author believes that a strict prohibition is too strong. The author recommends that the body's standing orders specify that the Chair *may* decline to accept a second-degree amendment at their discretion, and that an amendment to a second-degree amendment is out of order.
+Additionally, some authorities provide that an amendment may not be itself amended (a *second-degree amendment*), and that alternative amendments should instead be :mref:`foreshadowed `.\ [#fn62]_ This has the advantage of avoiding the potentially confusing conceptual complexity of ‘amending an amendment’, but the author believes that a strict prohibition is too strong. The author recommends that the body's standing orders specify that the Chair *may* decline to accept a second-degree amendment at their discretion, and that an amendment to a second-degree amendment is out of order.
Moving and proceeding with amendments
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^